Optimal tuning of fractional order PID controller using nelder-mead method: A case study

Authors

  • Son Nguyen Thanh Hanoi University of Science and Technology
  • Nhung Vu Thi Phuong Hanoi University of Science and Technology
  • Tu Pham Minh Hanoi University of Science and Technology
  • Anh Hoang Hanoi University of Science and Technology
  • Trung Cao Thanh Hanoi University of Science and Technology
  • Long Nguyen Hoang Viettel Networks

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64032/mca.v29i4.281

Keywords:

Classical PID controller, fractional order PID controller, Nelder-Mead method, FOMCON Toolbox for MATLAB

Abstract

For many years, the classical proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller has been used in many control systems as this controller is easy to design. In addition, the fractional order proportional-integral-derivative (FOPID) controller has been introduced as an extended version of the classical PID controller. The optimal adjustment of the classical PID and FOPID controller in control systems is essential for achieving the desired performance of the system output. Diverse optimization strategies have also been employed to finely tune the classical PID and FOPID controller parameters. This paper describes a detailed process of deploying the FOPID controller for single-input and single-output (SISO) control systems. The Nelder-Mead approach, a derivative-free optimization technique, is employed to optimize both the classical PID and FOPID controller. Finally, a real-time simulation of a brushed DC motor is also conducted by using the Simulink, the FOMCON Toolbox for MATLAB and the Arduino Nano to demonstrate the effectiveness of the FOPID controller in comparison to the classical PID controller.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Nguyen Thanh, S., Vu Thi Phuong, N., Pham Minh, T., Hoang, A., Cao Thanh, T., & Nguyen Hoang, L. (2025). Optimal tuning of fractional order PID controller using nelder-mead method: A case study. Journal of Measurement, Control, and Automation, 29(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.64032/mca.v29i4.281

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.